Which action would you take?
Your group disagrees about the direction of a project. Two people want a risky creative idea, while you think the safer idea meets the marking criteria better.
The situation
Your group disagrees about the direction of a project. Two people want a risky creative idea, while you think the safer idea meets the marking criteria better.
Recommended Response
C. Compare both ideas against the marking criteria and agree a decision deadline.
This moves the group from preference to evidence and stops the debate dragging on.
Context matters. This is a recommendation for the situation described, not a rule for every interaction.
Explore every response
A. Let the loudest people decide so the group can move on.
This avoids conflict, but it may sacrifice the criteria that affect the grade.
B. Refuse to contribute unless your idea is chosen.
This creates pressure rather than a better decision.
C. Compare both ideas against the marking criteria and agree a decision deadline. (Recommended)
This moves the group from preference to evidence and stops the debate dragging on.
D. Secretly prepare your own version in case theirs fails.
A backup can help in emergencies, but secret work may split the group.
E. Ask the tutor whether the risky idea fits the brief.
Tutor guidance can help if the group cannot judge the criteria clearly.
Why is C the recommended response?
Understanding this situation
The strongest decision process uses the criteria everyone will be marked against.
Another reasonable perspective
Asking the tutor is reasonable if the group is stuck or the brief is genuinely unclear.
Practice. Speak. Improve. — Spekero Playground
